AN OVERVIEW TO THE USE OF BONDS
The following are excerpts from an 8-2005 discourse on Bonds… however re-stated and updated for the reader’s edification. This matter involved two private men before the court… in regards to filing a Bond on the case… at time of sentencing!
Note; The FBI is the Plaintiff in the case as an agency of the United State of America. USA is now a corporation and the name may have been copyrighted by the Federal government, U.S., Inc.
When in court the judge knows you are after the money issue and nothing else. In most cases!! Whether a traffic ticket, a criminal case or IRS, ‘they’re’ after your so-called money and/or we are/you are after the money issue either for damages, discharge, or to set-off! Today in court, your primary purpose is to only to give notice of agreement, of discharge, etc., but not to argue!
In the court matter, everything is a ‘criminal offense’, which is an act or omission (failing to do something) against the Government/regime/statute, etc. You are presumed to be a ‘subject’ of the government owing allegiance (how often have you stated the ‘Pledge of Allegiance?) to the military/government construct private courts and it’s private codes, statutes or otherwise. These acts or omissions are purely ‘political’ in nature. (You are to come in, plead guilty, pay the fine or go to jail and shut up! No rights, you cannot argue because all the cards are stacked against you! The court is in business to collect as much so-called money as it can for its government corporation accounts per the commercial scheme!) That is what they call “justice” today.
In this setting, the/a Bond was filed into the case, One stated at (sentencing) time of ‘Allocution”, “I never knowingly and willfully committed any act or omission with the intent to defraud or harm and I do not consent nor volunteer to any administrative fine or punishment.” Whereupon the judge said “We are dismissed!” The question is… who are ‘we’ and ‘who’ dismissed them? It is believed that each and every attorney in the room is the ‘we’ and it was the private man (SPC) that dismissed them, the case and the claim with the allocution statement read or stated into the record. SPC stands for Secured Party Creditor.
Due to the filing of the Bond, if the judge might say the words in the court room “payable immediately,” those are code words to the officers of the court (the attorneys) for them to get out their checkbooks as one of them is going to have to pay… at the clerk of court counter. This man’s attorney told him that if the man didn’t pay immediately that he the attorney would be in jail before sundown. Here again, the attorney is attempting to “attorning” (turning over) his liability to pay to one of the men (or you) to pay! Since the filing of the Bond removes you from all liability, why would you want to pay?
It is the job of the attorney to con-vince you that you are the defendant and have to pay or go to jail. Yes, it’s con-job and if he doesn’t convince you, it may be him that becomes the one who pays!
The only discretion a judge has regarding any ‘special assessments’ was to determine who is going to pay the assessment(s) which is mandatory under 18 U.S.C. §3013, of which only the attorneys are subject to under the United States Code! The judge in this matter stated that “we won’t get anything out of these guys,” speaking of the private men.
Had the judge pronounced sentence, there is no way under current federal law that the private men would or could be released pending appeal. The reason; “The Bail Reform Act reversed the former presumption in favor of release pending appeal.” Once a defendant is convicted, the court must order detention unless it finds by clear and convincing evidence that defendant(s) is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of any person or the community.
In addition, before a court can allow a release, it must find that the defendant’s appeal is not for the purpose of delay and raises “substantial questions of law or fact” likely to result in a reversal, a new trial, a sentence with no imprisonment, or a sentence less that the total already served, including expected length of the appeal process.” (See 18 U.S.C. §§ 3141, 3142, 3143.)
In this matter, the judge stated that the men were sentenced to 51 months, but the judge did not state of what or where or say the words prison, jail or correction facility. The judge could have said; “You are hereby sentenced to serve fifty-one months in a United States prison or detention facility.” The judge did use the word “self reporting… the conditions are the same now the same as before the hearing.” In this matter, the men had to call in once a week to a probation officer. So things were the same as then, but no jail time!
Presumption here is the filing of the Bond pushes one out or establishes clear separation from the code/statutes (to a time period of law not code) and the de-facto government corporation, as you are truly not a party to it, unless by your ignorance or you consent. Such as; “I plead guilty,” “I accept the plea agreement,” “I consent to the sentencing of the court!” (Do not allow your so-called attorney to use threat, duress to coerce you into a plea agreement or to PLEAD GUILTY…at any time!)
Again, under the current code, the judge had no authorization or discretion to release the men. Something took them out of the code or their ‘foreign jurisdiction’ for surety on the charges, as the Bond (the insurance policy) indemnifies all their de-facto claims, charges or otherwise to ‘insure’ the so-called funds are available if there is cause or damage to the case/the public/the Admiralty ‘program’ via the bankruptcy since there is no money, based upon your acceptance per your full unlimited commercial liability as the ‘Creditor’/sovereign man – outside and above de-facto government/Matrix.
The ‘program’ changed from ‘Constitutional money of exchange’ to ‘Money of Account’ (commercial paper/instruments/bookkeeping entries) due to the U.S. Bankruptcy. Do you think that you can go into the Matrix and ‘PAY’ a debt at law in behalf of your debtor or otherwise?
The Bond as filed with the Clerk of Court is a permanent part of the record. The Bond is not an argument, opinion, or a point of law. It cannot be objected to. It is an insurance policy as due to the U.S. Bankruptcy, everything is insured. (See special bona as described in Rule E of the Supplemental Admiralty Rules at the back of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure – this is the only place in the Rules where Bonds are applicable in their venue/code.) All Bonds are in Admiralty as well as all insurance is in Admiralty! You have been drawn into the Matrix, a foreign jurisdiction to you as you are not a party to that jurisdiction (not a party to the social compact; their constitution – Padleford vs. City of Savannah, 1854), though bankrupt, ‘they’ are seeking from you to ‘pay’ or be the ‘surety’ for the debts of your debtor via your voluntary payment, consent or otherwise, making you believe that you are liable when there is no constitutional money of exchange, limiting their liability.
In the same manner, the words; arrest, seizure and forfeiture are all Admiralty terms! Bonds apply where so-called money is involved. In almost every case… money or ‘dollar’ amounts are the key issue!
In this matter, the Bond was filed one hour before the hearing started, so that no one could figure out how to deal with it and side-step the men and their Bond. If they could have removed the Bond, those men would have been compelled to the code! They were not!
The bond is filed with the Clerk of Court and is a permanent part of the record. There are two copies plus the original all bearing the file stamp. If the original is removed from the file, is it some sort of fraud, or did ‘they’ go lodge it, deposit it or what? But, there’d better be a copy in the court file. There is to be a separate docket sheet that lists all the filing in handwritten format. A couple of days later, it might be wise to get a copy of the Bond or whatever is in the court file just for your records and to see what they did with it (check the back of the bond!), if they lodged it, deposited or even if it yet remains in the file?
In this particular case, these men did not participate in the trial. They may have appeared (special appearance), but not a general appearance. They provided no witnesses, no exhibits, no defense, did not question witnesses. DID NOT ARGUE OR TESTIFIED! They just sat there and observed. The attorneys were going nuts and begging them to testify on their behalf. If they did, they would have waived their rights, stepped into a controversy, kissed the ‘code’ and ANY THING THEY MAY HAVE SAID COULD AND WOULD BE USED AGAINST THEM IN A COURT OF (Admiralty) LAW and they would have consented to the payment/liability of commercial criminal charges ($$$$$$)!
It is perceived that they then became true Plaintiffs (Real Parties in Interest) but not subject to the jurisdiction, and certainly not a signatory to their Constitution, not a party to their social compact and not named in their statutes. (But if you accept their program, step into the controversy and consent… guess what?)
The Court needed them to file pleadings and testify (agreeing and consenting to the claim and jurisdiction) and they did neither… therein denying ‘personum’ jurisdiction, as the court had ‘subject matter’ jurisdiction over the case via the complaint, information or indictment. These men only filed affidavits and one motion (?) (Be aware that ‘motions’ give the court jurisdiction). One of these men, after he got on the record declared “no due process.” But how could he cry ‘no due process’ if he/they were not participating?
They believed that the Bond removed them from the controversy (an arena of adversaries) and covered any contingency (loss/costs – via language in the Bond). Well, they did not give the court ‘personum’ jurisdiction, they did not enter the controversy and the Bond, being the insurance policy to Bond the entire case/costs/liability or otherwise as applied to their Debtor(s) and since they were (somewhat) sovereign, possibly secured party creditor and Real Parties in Interest… they were there only to give notice, possibly of agreement of the parties (CAFV) and stand on their Bond and observe the on goings of a de-facto corporate Admiralty tribunal bent on collecting some money, making commercial paper (judgments) and putting a couple of sureties in protective custody (prison) while their commercial paper and their bonds made them millions of dollars. That is, in fact, what goes on.
It can be said that due to the Bond, the judge no longer saw these men as adversaries in the courtroom per any controversy. The controversy can continue between the attorneys no matter what the outcome should be as there would be no losers due to the Bond. Keep in mind; the Defendant (Debtor) is guilty of the commercial charge/crime. But you are not to argue that. If you do, you as the surety just stepped into the controversy and you just gave the judge to use judicial determination per the case. The in the federal statutes, it states most crimes have been converted into commercial crimes… so that they can make more so-called money!
One needs to ‘Accept the Case for Value’ and return it to them with the Bond and it should remove the man from the controversy. It is suggested that you file the Bond at the last minute, just before going into the hearing or trial. If the Bond is filed too soon, they have a chance to study and react to it in some capacity. Use surprise to your advantage!
The judge or some other officer of the court has the authority to adjust the account and hold the Bond. The judge may hold it for justification and may direct one of the attorneys to pay on the case.
In this matter, no fine was assessed, no one was given prison time, the judge stating that he did not want to “disturb any Ones schedule”… could not have been directed to these men. It is perceived that one or more of the attorneys is liable and on the hook for the sentence of time or dollar value due to the Bond being filed.
At the beginning of the case there is to be a bond executed by the prosecutor. It may be a blanket bond on file with the clerk of court. The bond in not case specific, but has the signatures of all attorneys that could be assigned to the case including prosecutors. If a Bond later appears in the record that is case specific, the whole ‘commercial scam’ goes up in flames! GET THE POINT?
WHO’S ON FIRST – WHAT’S ON SECOND?
“In as much as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc., can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them.” (S.C.R. 1795, Penhallow vs. Doan’s Administrators, 3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54, Supreme Court of the United States - 1795)
Therefore, in the Matrix, the “defendant” is identified on the citation, on the complaint, information or indictment and in the case, because its all dealing with the artificial ‘persons’ and since it is all commercial, the Defendant (noun and title) only applies to the fiction/artificial who is guilty of every charge/crime. The defendant must pay with so-called dollars or do the time or both. That’s the commercial program!
When one goes into prison, it is the “all capital” lettered name and ‘title’ (commitment order?) is admitted and placed on the ID tag. When the man, as surety, is to be discharged from the department of corrections, he comes out in proper English spelled name of the man. Let’s use the prison facility as the Matrix. What goes in has to be artificial (on paper and in the accounting) and what comes out is the real man. They send your proper English name to the Department of Corrections to be placed on the Books, and the “all-caps” (Defendant/Debtor) and your body (the surety) to a specific prison awaiting the time limit per discharge, per the court judgment/sentencing formula of time backed up by the ‘assessment’ made by the prosecutor/U.S. assistant attorney for the bonds. The department of corrections holds the ‘title’ and the Board of Parole/Bureau of Prison (BOP) gets possession of the all-caps name entity/debtor and the body. The all-caps name is the “evidence of title” held somewhere in a prison for the body.
The Department of Corrections as ‘owner,’ has to pay for care, dental and health (if any), meals, clothing, etc., quarterly because they are the responsible party (owner) of the property as the owner of property pays all costs. The prison warden is the ‘user’ who has control of the property. He is not responsible for payment. He has costs and expenses in care of the property. The warden has control (possesses) the property during the sentencing time period until release, parole, discharge or death. The property can be transferred to another facility, but the ‘title’ remains elsewhere.
In the private man version, the ‘man’ is perceived as a ‘human resource’ as property. The body of the man has free will attached to it and the ability to independent action. (The action one may have taken was seen as a commission of some act or crime, though only commercial) So you One (the body) is now sitting in jail/prison under control of the jailer (user) on the basis of that commercial CHARGE by a prosecutor (owner) filing a complaint on that basis of that commercial value attached to the act/crime. So it doesn’t matter what the complaint is about, as it is not about the act/crime (as all crimes have been converted to commercial crimes) but merely the commercial (money value) associated to the commercial act/crime for that ‘jurisdiction’ per commercial paper (judgments/bonds) being created by the officers of that jurisdiction/court.
The objective here for ‘them’ is to place your name on an account and using your body, as the surety, during the time frame of their ‘ownership’… commercially, and on that account is your debtor’s corporate/fiction name, i.e., JOHN A. DOE.
When one becomes aware of this commercial scheme, you ask them for their bond that was posted per the act/crime allowing them to this. Should they go silent (silence equates to agreement), you now move forward to prepare/file your Bond to be sent or delivered to the Clerk of the Court for posting into the court file/account.
So now, in the background, your proper English name must be removed from their books (the title!) They can no longer use your name/title because you have posted your Bond for the record and paid for everything via your private exemption. Either they substitute another name (and body) in your place or they drop/adjust their charges/account and in some cases release the surety (you) from jail or prison.
The situation of their committing you to unlawful incarceration and of the fact that the case was void ab initio is not an issue here, but can be dealt with via CAFV and Tort Claim.
USING THE CAR OWNERSHIP SITUATION AS AN EXAMPLE:
The DMV (agency) in the system has control of JOHN A. DOE and another (department) has title of John Anderson Doe which is the name “John Anderson Doe” they put on their books.
The car; CHEVY, being the property and evidence of hidden title.
JOHN A. DOE is named as “owner” on the “Certificate of Title” and is responsible for all taxes, costs and misuse of the property by whoever possesses and uses said property. JOHN A. DOE is a creation of the government/state.
John Anderson Doe is the party in possession with ‘use’ of the CHEVY and is often tricked into believing that he is JOHN A. DOE for the purpose of paying all debts of JOHN A. DOE regarding the CHEVY.
John Anderson Doe, the man via his name is held in the background on the books of the State, secretly, on the RES (thing) title to the CHEVY, as owner and user. They can’t show this though because it would expose the fraud that the State is also a party regarding conflicting ownership of the CHEVY which keeps John Anderson Doe from enjoying “absolute title” and ownership and possession (the droit-droit) of the object/Res = CHEVY! Remember, all property was pledged to the State via the U.S. Bankruptcy in respect to the National Emergency. That’s why the State can require; Driver license, registration and insurance… cause your using/driving their property!
If John Anderson Doe has “absolute title” of ownership and possession, then John Anderson Doe could not be taxed on his private property!
“JOHN A. DOE” is the public version of the body (artificial entity) and “John Anderson Doe” is the private version of the body (real - flesh & blood!) The body itself is nameless and it was the body that appeared first in the world and it is the father of all that comes after it. The names are attached to identify the body in different capacities. Once a division is established in the record between the names, the whole scheme goes up in smoke. The system NEEDS a fictional version of you; JOHN A. DOE. (See page 3, last paragraph).
So when an action/complaint is filled or when JOHN A. DOE is sued, “John Anderson Doe” (the private man/name) is being held on the books in the background, as surety, at the clerk’s office regarding the case. In walks the Real-Private Man (the body) and files the Bond as executed for/by
John Anderson Doe” covering (indemnifying) the case… oops… JOHN A. DOE and John Anderson Doe are now divided (separated). You cannot take one-half of the body… they need both for both sides of the account to do their commercial magic.
If they lose one side of the account, they lose both sides of the account. There is a Public side of the account and a Private side of the account. They apply private law (codes) to the PUBLIC “JOHN A. DOE.” The private “John Anderson Doe” is secretly held on the books in the background. The private man “John Anderson Doe” gets Public law for his use, thus he executes a ‘Bond” using his private exemption as payment and places the bond into the public record via the Clerk of Court. The Public law has just been executed by the private “John Anderson Doe”!
It is now up to the judge to decide what’s gong to happen with the case. Either the prosecutor is going to drop the case and dismiss the commercial charges, or the court could place another name that is already in the record onto the books as a “substitution of parties”, primarily being one of the attorneys! If a case is to far down the track, i.e., a jury verdict has been rendered, the judge may have no choice but to substitute parties due to the Bond now appearing in the record.
Any time after the Bond is filed; the judge stands up and may say. “We are dismissed…” he just abandoned the Court to whoever is left sitting in the courtroom, i.e., the attorneys. He just left the field of Battle first. Next the attorneys, bailiffs and marshals will vacate very soon afterwards! The private man/people must always remain and be the last to leave a vacant courtroom! It’s being taped so the tape record will show that the corporate officers left the battle field first.
Also, when the books/accounts are in conformance with the public record, watch for the ‘blended name,’ it may appear like this; DOE, John Anderson.
In their matrix/system of commerce, everything is encoded, and in that commercial scheme, all is a signal to those in the know of what’s really going on and what the conditions are. WHO’s on first, WHATS on second, WHENS on third?
Roger Elvick was right. There are always two sides of an account, always have been, always will be! The system’s goal is to blend the accounts and THE NAMES together to make you believe or thing that you are responsible and liable for the commercial $$$ charges associated to a traffic citation, complaint, information, indictment or for any fine, fee, tax, debt, judgment or otherwise.
You have to cause division between the artificial and the real, between the COMMERCIAL ENTITY and the Private Sentient Man.
That is done with the Bond!
If you find yourself behind bars appoint a power of attorney and then have them contact Redeem The Truth. CLICK HERE for our Prison Release process,
Thank you for visiting Redeem The Truth.